Radovan

That's exactly what I meant, I just wanted to save the developer a comparison with InDesign 🙂 and I'm waiting for the Affinity way of solving it. That's exactly what I meant, I just wanted to save the developer a comparison with InDesign 🙂 and I'm waiting for the Affinity way of solving it.

OK. I don't want to argue why I need 72 DPI. So, please, ignore my second question - is not so important as the first: Why changing DPI of document affects the size (zoom) of the linked resource? I may also ask why does a DPI change only affect some linked resources and not others?

Why changing DPI of document affects the size (zoom) of the linked resource? See attached files... How can I export for example 72 DPI resolution JPG for WEB, but I want document keep with 300 DPI?

Thank you, Jon P 👍

Thanks for the tip, but I'm afraid this feature won't help either. It was supposed to make work easier, where I return on many pages to repetitive (not identical) graphics.

Thank you, I was hoping for a better solution. As you write, I finally did it. It is time consuming when deleting a lot of lines on many pages. In In Design operation for less than a second.

When copying objects between pages, it would be very helpful to be able to paste the copied object to the same coordinates (it is not always possible to use a master page). This is related to the second proposal - when switching through the pages at a higher magnification, it would be useful to display the same part of the page (again at the same coordinates). This is useful, for example, for checking footer texts, page numbers, or checking the alignment of the upper borders of text frames, etc. In general, for checking and copying all elements that are repeated in the same place. Thank you

It is hard for me to know what is bug and what is purpose, sorry. I have already published as a request few days ago.

1/ Sometimes preferences don't work well when choosing page sizes (I enter eg A1 and the size is completely different, I have to enter it manually). - 2/ I would welcome a more readable outline of the active frame when editing a numeric parameter (eg CMYK values or page size). I switch with the TAB key and I like visual control over the edited part. 3/ If I have more than one menu on one floating menu, I would welcome the option to close any of them. 4/ Copying graphic objects as bullets is a big problem. The object is copied with the bullet text in a different size and must be pasted again. 5/ Difficult to select text in a table where the row is close to the edge of the cell. In the standard view (without zooming in) it is practically impossible to select the text and it is necessary to zoom. But in general, satisfaction with the features and ergonomics of Affinity Publisher prevails.

How can I simply delete the red colored part of a row in the table if I want to keep the merged cell A2-A7 - see the attached picture? Thank you for proposing an effective solution.

MOV_20201223_2105420.mp4

Affinity Publisher - suggestions for improvement 1/ Sometimes preferences don't work well when choosing page sizes (I enter eg A5 and the size is completely different, I have to enter it manually). 2/ I would welcome a more readable outline of the active frame when editing a numeric parameter (eg CMYK values or page size). I switch with the TAB key and I like visual control over the edited part. 3/ If I have more than one menu on one floating menu, I would welcome the option to close any of them. 4/ Copying graphic objects as bullets is a big problem. The object is copied with the bullet text in a different size and must be pasted again. 5/ Difficult to select text in a table where the row is close to the edge of the cell. In the standard view (without zooming in) it is practically impossible to select the text and it is necessary to zoom. But in general, satisfaction with the features and ergonomics of Affinity Publisher prevails.

Thanks, I'll try it. Adobe In Design works similarly.

I may have found the cause, but it's not good news for Adobe CS4 migrants like me. It seems to work on the links I made at Affinity. When I work with a document that came from IDML and I didn't edit its linked documents, the Show in Explorer button has trouble seeing them (you can try it on my documents embedded at the beginning of this topic). If I replace the link (just replace it with the same one), the Show in Expolorer button works well (see scr2.png). When it doesn't work it shows like opening Windows Explorer in the Windows menu - it shows the default location - My Computer (see scr1.png). So it's a bug that bothers me a lot now, because I have to fix a larger number of linked files.

This is a good solution, thank you for it. My current emergency solution has been more slower. The situation is now most complicated by a malfunctioning Show in Expolorer button. Thanks a lot