David in Яuislip

You can see the data using the Detail dropdown of the metadata tab, if you need to copy values dropdown to Raw data or use the hamburger and Export to XMP <exif:GPSAltitude>267/1</exif:GPSAltitude> <exif:GPSAltitudeRef>0</exif:GPSAltitudeRef> <exif:GPSLatitude>32,42.991833N</exif:GPSLatitude> <exif:GPSLongitude>16,45.864667W</exif:GPSLongitude> <exif:GPSMapDatum>WGS84</exif:GPSMapDatum> <exif:GPSProcessingMethod>CELLID</exif:GPSProcessingMethod> <exif:GPSSatellites>00</exif:GPSSatellites> <exif:GPSTimeStamp>2023-11-21T13:24:21Z</exif:GPSTimeStamp> <exif:GPSVersionID>2.3.0.0</exif:GPSVersionID> Data embeds to jpeg & tiff exports ok

Open in Chrome Print to pdf Open in Photo Clip canvas Export You can get a smaller file out of Inkscape but it takes more work. Is it possible to export a pdf from Typora ? exampleInk.svg

Glad it worked. Regarding the GPS data, there is none in the exiftool report DSCN1600.NRW.txt

This camera is not in the lensfun database at https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/blob/master/data/db/compact-nikon.xml so I have made a profile using P1000 with distortion and tca data greater than f=359 (2000 35mm equiv) deleted. It autoselects the camera and gives a good result for the sample image but whether it's useful for other focal lengths is unknown. You could experiment by taking a few photos of a brick wall or similar at different focal lengths Place the attached xml in the lens profile folder and restart Photo. To find folder go to Edit/Preferences/General where there is a button near the bottom which opens the folder in explorer Haha, good but no cigar. I still have a 995 which was marvellous in its day but probably hasn't been switched on for nearly 20 years NikonP950.xml

You need a document open, a blank will do In the Adjustment studio, click LUT Click the cog and create a new category Click the cog again and rename as required Click the cog again and select Import Navigate to your LUT folder, select the files and OK

You can use a vector shape with gradient to mimic the built-in raster mask, just remember to adjust opacity instead of colour Here I have applied an HSL layer to reduce saturation to 0 but then modified that with a rectangle over the entire canvas which has a radial gradient applied - this remains editable. Colour of the gradient does not matter, the initial opacity is 100, the final opacity is 0 Hope that helps

Funny that, I assumed the original post to request that slices be exported at the same size as the main image but just containing the sliced bit, probably the old ass, you and me scenario but I digress Here's a macro that works for vector shapes, text and images within and without groups If it doesn't work you can have your money back p.s. it only works for up to 50 layers, but that's another story Slices-FullSize.afmacro

Try this macro, if it works you can use it in a New Batch Job for many files Recolour0-100-0.afmacro

Select the layers in the group and use GarryP's handle

Select the Picture frame, <ctrl>G to group it, resize the group with the handles

No it's from a different lens, the 35mm F1.2 DG DN | Art 019, I just took a flyer to see what would happen. I think it's better than no correction and in some cases may be ok but it isn't suitable for architectural shots. What you need doesn't yet exist in lensfun

Yes, that's my conclusion. This is one for the folk in Nottingham to fix

Life's too short for that, I use Photolab which has superb lens distortion corrections plus Viewpoint which allows additional perspective correction. Anyone interested in such corrections would be advised to try the trials. The lcp comes from Adobe and was installed with the DNG converter. I think it's likely that Photo doesn't implement the lcp correction properly. I don't have any software that uses lcp's other than Photo but I would be amazed that Adobe would produce something that makes the issue worse eg in the image below the lcp version looks more barrelled than the uncorrected one to my eyes

Looking at the lcp and lensfun corrections the former still shows a fair bit of barrelling and is basically useless

If you open the lcp file in a text editor you will see this a few lines down from the top stCamera:LensPrettyName="SIGMA 35mm F1.4 DG DN A021" Replace all instances of SIGMA 35mm F1.4 DG DN A021 with 35mm F1.4 DG DN | Art 021 so they read stCamera:LensPrettyName="35mm F1.4 DG DN | Art 021" the lens will then be automagically recognised by Photo. I'd post the lcp but think they may be subject to Adobe copyright

I never liked XP1/2, much preferred FP3/4, HPS, Tri X generally developed in ID11. I dumped all of my darkroom stuff except the enlarger which is a pre-war Focomat and a thing of beauty Anyway, back to the scan, as a confirmed Luddite I check the channels on scans and choose the one with best contrast, in this case the red Then create a greyscale layer and apply a curve adjustment

From Help "Preferences Preferences comprise a series of miscellaneous options that are applied across your application. They can be used to set up your own way of working. General options <snip> For automatic RAW lens correction, include lens profile updates for new cameras. Place the downloaded Lensfun XML file or Adobe Lens Correction Profile (LCP) in the opened folder."

I suggest you try both, lcp files can be used with Photo. Whenever I have compared them in the past the lensfun profiles came out better although it's subtle. Good luck

You can do this the proper way per Alfred's link or you can cheat and borrow a similar profile Try attached xml in the Lens Profiles Folder - see Help if you're unfamiliar with this. I see a reduction in barrel distortion, comments in xml show what I did Sigma35mmf1-4dgdnFaux.xml

I would suggest updating the graphics driver first as it's free. I don't have any Affinity results to share but using PhotoLab v7.2.0 to export 42 images 5134x3888 down to 600 high took 2h 1m 20s with the old driver, it now takes 0h 28m 25s Just created an image in V1 per your numbers 7086 x 10629, 32bit ROMM RGB and the performance is fine using paintbrush, clone stamp, smudge, erase brush 1000px diameter, this is a pretty mediocre spec pc as you can see below

Here's a pdf exported from Inkscape 1.3 (0e150ed6c4, 2023-07-21), seems to open ok in Publisher V1 Breadcrumbs2-ink.pdf

Resizing canvas is a pita in a macro. Transforms are hopeless, Duplicate and Equations are useful but although equations can increase an object's size it will be clipped by the canvas so that needs to be increased first. You can use John's advice to resize to a large number but here is another way. If you duplicate a pixel layer rotate 90° around its centre unclip canvas you will generate a square canvas Then use a fill layer rasterise rotate 45° unclip canvas you will generate a canvas increased by a bit less than x root2 so it's greater than your 20% (Do that step again and the canvas will be almost double the original etc.) The attached macro does this but I'm a bit foxed. The resized fill layer will have partial transparent pixels at the edges I tried a procedural texture of =ROUND(A/255)*255 for the Alpha but that failed I tried applying a curves layer to boost the alpha and that worked a couple of times but fails in the macro So, you can resize, for example, an 800x600 image to either 958 (x1.1975) or 962 (x1.2025) wide, I can't get it to be exactly x1.2 ResizeCanvas120pc.afmacro

This is my effort using Document/ Add Pages from File Windows V1.10.6 00Goldsetterintromasterclass-recovered.zip

After creating the preset it should appear in the Adjustment panel so it can be reused Have a look here re. suggestions https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/forum/52-feedback-suggestions/

The file doesn't open properly in Chrome either. I didn't understand shape-inside: url(#rect4); so I deleted it. That showed the text positions same as Chrome so delete the tspan styles as below. Do File/Clean Up Document, Save from Inkscape and it will now load properly into Chrome and Affinity CRShirtsTest-APout.svg