Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Fizmarble

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for the info on Fill Mode. Here is a little more about my "font". I downloaded the font Art Brush and modified the ends of the "brush stroke" in the letters to make them look how I want. So, they aren't simply text letters converted to a curve. They are text letters converted to curves and then manipulated. It seems that this manipulation may have done something awry. But it worked fine with the many other letters I created via the same process. Big shrug.
  2. That information is gone with the seasons I did your same steps to the node to the left of the one you highlighted and the same action occurred, so maybe they are buddies. Also, What's with this mess? 20231115-1747-37.5836244.mp4
  3. For example. I copied the M and changed one node to smooth node, making it visible. Then I applied a contour of -0.014 to both curves. The one on the right is the "good" one. The one on the left is the original, uncooperative one.
  4. On other curves, I'm allowed to have a negative value. But I also noticed on this one when I increase the contour to positive values, it seems to increase stroke but not fill, which I'm sure I'm saying it wrong, but that's how it looks.
  5. I, unfortunately, don't know exactly what the fill mode is. Is it solid vs. gradient and the like? Regardless, I've attached a copy of the file with only the problem curve. It sure seems like a bug to me, though I don't know how to replicate it. It was part of a symbol and a series of other letters, but those letters were all visible. Invisible M.afdesign
  6. I was able to select a node and choose "smooth node". That revealed my curve and I can now change its appearance and everything. I suppose the smooth node change modified the curve in some way, and it may not be exactly as it was, but at least I can see it.
  7. I opened a file that I had last used in Designer V1, but this is in V2. Almost all of my image is present, but I can't see a single letter (that is actually a curve). If I use the select tool, it's just a rectangularish shape around it. If I select the node tool, I can see my curve's ghost. I can't (or don't know how to) apply any fill or stroke to it. I found this thread, but I wasn't able to resolve my issue with the information included. Any ideas?
  8. Affinity Designer 2.1 Currently, I have a compound object, as I thought that would get me some more flexibility. I'd like the circle to have a solid stroke, and possibly a different color stroke. Is this possible?
  9. Maybe this is a niche issues, but I wanted to denoise a photo in Publisher, so I loaded the Photo Persona. I was surprised to find that I couldn't invoke a plugin from there. I understand Publisher doesn't support plugins yet, but since Photo does, and I was in the Photo Persona, I expected it to work. Thanks for listening!
  10. I did notice that. I also noticed if you have 255,255,255 holding shift doesn't give the expected result of moving them all in unison to gray which seems obvious. This is evidenced when moving from 0,0,0 and the sliders all move together towards white (in RBG mode). If it's by design, then by your reasoning they should not all move together when any value has a 0 in it.
  11. It works as long as none of sliders is all the way to the right. This sounds like a bug. A single 255 will prevent shift dragging the sliders together. I just tested Publisher V2, same problem. 255 breaks it. I also tested this in Photo V1 and it's apparently always been broken. I just learned about this shortcut (from an Affinity tutorial) and had only tried it in V2, but it's always been broken.
  12. Photo/Designer V2, Color Panel, the help file says holding Shift while dragging a color panel slider moves all sliders at once. This is only true if any slider is NOT all the way to the right. Windows 11
  13. The common defense for its exclusion is "nobody uses BMP anymore". I've never exported to TGA or TIFF, but I'm not assuming no one uses them. I figure they are valuable to some groups, and I'm glad they have the option. I need BMPs, but have to use another application to get them.
  14. I half expected to see BMP export after all the discussion and suggestions for V1 to include it. That thread is closed, so here is my official suggestion for BMP export support to be included in V2. It's the standard for several Industrial Controls software packages and using MS Paint or IrfanView breaks my workflow and creates unnecessary intermediary files. Thanks for listening.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.