Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

rhinorrhea

New Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

Posts posted by rhinorrhea

  1. Hello there!

    I'd like to preface this with saying that I'm a seasoned GIMP user, so I can't help comparing Affinity Photo to GIMP. I haven't spent much time with Affinity Photo, but just enough to compare some of the more basic features to those found in GIMP.

    I've recently decided to give the Affinity Photo trial a go and I liked it a lot! I found that it has some features that GIMP either doesn't have at all, or only has rudimentary support for. I also like the general workflow, it's pretty "clean". I purchased a license today and started tinkering with it some more. I drew a vector shape and tried to draw some brush strokes along its outline. However, it seems that snapping brushes to vectors isn't possible, unless there's something I don't understand. I made sure all my snapping settings were correct, I looked in the help, I googled a bit and found e.g. this thread. Specifically, this post claims that:

    Quote

    The brushes in Affinity Photo are raster based. They are not attached to any vector path and thus don't snap to the grid/guides etc.

    I don't see how brushes being raster-based serves as an explanation as to why they don't snap to vector paths or... grid/guides?! Okay, this last part got me surprised. I dragged some guides onto my canvas and indeed, I couldn't draw brush strokes along them. To elaborate, I do realize that brushes are raster-based, and the items I'm trying to snap to are vector-based, but GIMP (while having rather primitive vector path functionality) allows me to do just that, and I wouldn't even have thought that something as basic as snapping to guides or grids could be a problem, as it's a normal thing there. I'm not convinced by the vector-raster discrepancy, as I'm simply trying to aid myself in drawing precisely, and if it isn't a problem for GIMP, I don't see how it's a problem for Affinity Photo. I do realize this would require quantizing/approximating the path to nearest pixels, which might not be as simple mathematically (edit: wait, it's already there, after all vector shapes can be rendered, so why can't they be snapped to?) and might result in some minor performance overhead, but user experience-wise, this seems like a basic feature.

    Is there something basic I'm missing or does Affinity Photo really not support drawing along a guide or a vector object? If so, are there plans for adding such support? It might not be a deal breaker for me, but I think I'll go sans-Serif for more serious projects for now and resort to GIMP, which I'm most comfortable with. I hoped Affinity Photo could replace GIMP for me, but it's not there yet. I haven't made a thorough feature comparison and don't know what else is missing from the workflow I'm used to, but it has a lot of stuff that I really like, so I hope it grows to be my favorite design/editing software.

    Cheers!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.