Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

foofoofoxfox

New Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    foofoofoxfox reacted to Joachim_L in Palette mass delete   
    There is no way I know of, but a good idea for a feature request.
  2. Like
    foofoofoxfox reacted to garrettm30 in Creation of a Master 'Exit' Text Key   
    It might be worth noting that you may have to press escape more than once. For example, if you have some selected text inside a text box, pressing escape once deselects the text and places the insertion point at the end of the text that was selected; a second time removes the insertion point, but still has the text frame selected; and a third time deselects the text frame entirely.
    Thank you @kdog3682, as your question has surfaced an area that in my opinion could be improved. My preference would be to remove the behavior of the first escape. I do not see any reason why pressing escape when there is text selected should then move the insertion point to the right of the selected text. If I actually want this behavior, then pressing the right arrow will do just that. On the other hand, removing that behavior can reduce user errors.
    Consider the following scenario: the focus is currently inside a text frame (in other words, the text frame is accepting keyboard input as text) and you want to switch to another tool. To do this with a keyboard shortcut, you need to first press escape, and then the keyboard shortcut, such as the V for the move tool. But if you have text selected, you must press escape twice before pressing V; otherwise, you end up just typing a single V somewhere in your text, and you might not even notice it. In this case, one must always consider whether text is selected (which not even be currently in view) to know how many times escape is necessary. Removing the behavior would remove no functionality, as one can accomplish the same with the right arrow if that is what one intends to do.
  3. Like
    foofoofoxfox reacted to TomAng in LOVE IT!   
    Just want to start by congratulating Serif on Publisher. I was brought up on Quark XPress, then used InDesign from its launch in 1994. Publisher has learnt from all their mistakes, uses hardware acceleration well and I LOVE IT! Have to get used to differences in language (positioning instead of baseline shift) but that's fine. I'm so happy to be able to dump Adobe's horrible subscription model and actually use something that's easier and more logical. So far, I've only produced 48-page booklets, and I don't know how it will handle big books. But I've always worked on 400 page books as spreads or small folios anyway.
    Cheers to the developers!
  4. Thanks
    foofoofoxfox reacted to walt.farrell in Regarding Publisher: How could I export PDFs spreads as individual pages?   
    Welcome to the Serif Affinity forums.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.