Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

RM f/g

Members
  • Posts

    287
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RM f/g

  1. Just what I was looking for, but I found out Designer  can't do this (yet).

    Definitely something I would like to see implemented, especially now I found out that exporting to pdf/x-1a:2003 ‘flattens’ transparent objects by  pixelating them.

    Sub-optimal behaviour, in my view. When I want pixels, I'll use Photo, with all due respect.

  2. APublisher imports neither the footnote text nor the footnote references.

    Following your technique, Footnote text will have to be copied from the source file and pasted one by one into the Publisher document and footnote references will have to be inserted manually. Dozens per chapter, in my case.

    Not a task I'm looking forward to.

  3. 8 hours ago, robinp said:

    Anyway, back on topic.

    Does anyone know of an app that has this feature, on the Mac and that isn't Illustrator? I need something that will allow me to edit line thicknesses en-masse when refining CAD drawings for presentation.

    thanks

    I just found Inkscape has an option to select by style.

    Will try out myself if I can use Inkscape to prepare files for Affinity, facing the same challenge with files originating from GIS application.

  4. In a document I have two objects, one of which is locked in the layers panel and cannot be moved. As is to be expected.

    When I select both objects (in the layers panel), then apply an alignment, the locked object may move, depending on the applied alignment.

    The same happens in Publisher.

    Not exactly shocking, but not how I think it should be.

     

  5. On 8/2/2018 at 12:34 PM, jhmdigital said:

    Sorry if this has been raised before.

    The default setting for ruler measurements in both Photo and Designer is pixels, presumably because the majority use that. However I mainly work in cms and it drives me round the bend have to change the setting each time I open a file.

    Please could a future update include the ability to set your own default measurement unit in Preferences?

    Yes, please!

    A measure tool of some kind would be welcome as well.

    A lot of my work is published at a fixed scale. Measuring a ruler included in the photo and then scaling the dimensions of the photo down to the desired (calculated) size is very common in my workl I can use a rectangular marquee combined with the info panel to take a measurement, but then often I have to rotate the ruler that is in the photo first to set it exactly horizontal. A measure tool is a lot faster.

  6. Exporting files as 1-bit tiff files would do for me, I presume.

    Part of my work is in the archaeological field. Drawings of finds are 99.9% drawn in ink on paper, scanned and eventually saved as 1-bit, 1200 ppi tiff.

    In Photoshop work on these scans is done in greyscale mode as possibilities in bitmap mode are ever so limited. Then converted to 1-bit and saved. So working on files in APhoto in greyscale mode and exporting the finished image as 1-bit tiff would do for me, I presume.

     

  7. On 6/28/2019 at 10:27 AM, RM f/g said:

    Looking for the multiplication sign in the glyp browser, I experienced some difficulty finding it.

    It appeared not to be in the group ‘Mathematic Operators’ but in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’.

    Looking further I noticed that the plus sign appears to be in ‘Basic Latin’, but the minus sign in ‘Mathematic Operators’.

    Strange enough, to me at least, something similar with fractions: ¼, ½ and ¾ are in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’, whereas ⅛, ⅜, ⅝, ⅞, ⅓ and ⅔ are to be found in ‘Number forms’.

     

    Is it possible to show glyphs not only in their ‘native’ group, but also in a ‘logical’ group? For example: the multiplication sign in the group ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’ and also in ‘Mathematical Operators’ (like InDesign does)? Would make them easier to find.

     

    Edit:

    Meanwhile I copied this topic to the Affinity Publisher forum, where it should have been in the first place.

    You know: Designer / InDesign. Not the first time I clicked myself into the wrong direction.

     

     

     

  8. Looking for the multiplication sign in the glyp browser, I experienced some difficulty finding it.

    It appeared not to be in the group ‘Mathematic Operators’ but in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’.

    Looking further I noticed that the plus sign appears to be in ‘Basic Latin’, but the minus sign in ‘Mathematic Operators’.

    Strange enough, to me at least, something similar with fractions: ¼, ½ and ¾ are in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’, whereas ⅛, ⅜, ⅝, ⅞, ⅓ and ⅔ are to be found in ‘Number forms’.

     

    Is it possible to show glyphs not only in their ‘native’ group, but also in a ‘logical’ group? For example: the multiplication sign in the group ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’ and also in ‘Mathematical Operators’ (like InDesign does)? Would make them easier to find.

     

    I published this topic at first accidentaly in the Affinity Designer forum. You know: Designer / InDesign. Not the first time I clicked myself into the wrong direction.

  9. Looking for the multiplication sign in the glyp browser, I experienced some difficulty finding it.

    It appeared not to be in the group ‘Mathematic Operators’ but in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’.

    Looking further I noticed that the plus sign appears to be in ‘Basic Latin’, but the minus sign in ‘Mathematic Operators’.

    Strange enough, to me at least, something similar with fractions: ¼, ½ and ¾ are in ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’, whereas ⅛, ⅜, ⅝, ⅞, ⅓ and ⅔ are to be found in ‘Number forms’.

     

    Is it possible to show glyphs not only in their ‘native’ group, but also in a ‘logical’ group? For example: the multiplication sign in the group ‘Latin - 1 Supplement’ and also in ‘Mathematical Operators’ (like InDesign does)? Would make them easier to find.

     

    Edit:

    Meanwhile I copied this topic to the Affinity Publisher forum, where it should have in the first place.

    You know: Designer / InDesign. Not the first time I clicked myself into the wrong direction.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.