Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

martinch

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by martinch

  1. On 8/31/2021 at 6:59 AM, Gabe said:

    Do you happen to have any other corrupt files at all that you could upload on the same link? 

    Also, have you seen this thread?: file-is-corrupted-and-closes-automatically-after-opening/

    I believe this user is experiencing the exact same issue as I. The problem was with a Publisher file, but the user found that the issue was being caused by a broken image file within the Publisher document, and removing it solved the problem. I strongly suspect the problematic image file was corrupted in the same manner as mine.

  2. 8 minutes ago, Gabe said:

    Hi @martinch,

    So that we are able to investigate bugs thoroughly could you please follow this link and update this post with the followings: https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/forum/71-bug-reporting/

    In addition to that, where do you keep your files? Local storage? Cloud? Network/external device? 

    I am storing it locally on a 4TB SATA HDD. It hasn't otherwise ever given me trouble.

    I am using Win10 Education, OS build 19041.1165

    Processor is an AMD Athlon II X3 455.

    I don't know how I could reproduce this problem, since it seems to happen randomly when saving. I can share the document.

    If I were to suggest any common factor when this happens, I can only say that to my recollection, I had multiple files open each time.

  3. I just posted this elsewhere in a reply where I found someone had the exact same problem, but reposting here in the correct forum section:

    I have now experienced multiple times an error saying "file seems to be corrupted" after saving a file. It cannot be opened. I am using the current 1.10.0.1127 version, but I also experienced it with the previous 1.09 version (was really hoping 1.10 would have solved this!).

    I am using Windows 10, kept up-to-date.

    Attached is screenshot. This appeared immediately after saving the file. After the error box popped up it closed the image. Shows same error if I try to reopen. Same for files where this has happened previously.

    AffinityCorruptFileError 2021-08-23 215216.png

  4. On 6/16/2019 at 4:57 PM, ImageryByWarren said:

    In Affinity Develop Persona my raw processing workflow is limited to:

    • Brighten (as image imports darker than it should - but no loss on quality
    • Lens correction (auto) with manual vertical rotation
    • Straighten then crop
    • Chromatic aberration
    • Defringing
    • Detail refinement (this works far better than Lightroom in my oipinion)
    • Noise reduction

    You're satisfied with the noise reduction? I didn't care for it at all. I wouldn't be satisfied processing underexposed images with Affinity, though these days, I've more often been erring toward exposing slightly to the right for less noise generally. I'm seeing a weird lack of definition with Affinity when compared to Camera Raw, Raw Therapee or DxO. None of my lenses were recognized by Affinity, so lens correction isn't so good either. In comparison, DxO and Camera Raw recognize my lenses no problem.

    I've been playing with some other applications to make more comparison. So far, RawTherapee and DxO PhotoLab2 are the two that seem to give the best results and have a workflow I'm comfortable with. I didn't care for Capture One's workflow at all... it's the same issue I have with Lightroom's. I don't like having to create these large projects or collections or "reels" or whatever they're called and then "import" my images into them. I want to just be able to easily browse and then develop and export individuals as I see fit. RawTherapee and DxO behave more akin to if I were using Bridge+Camera Raw (though less clunky than Bridge, thank goodness). But none of these applications seem to have what I need with precise curves adjustments (I posted separately about this). As one of my cameras is a Nikon D800, I've tried Capture NX-D as well, and it does get some good quality, but I found it processes very slowly on my computer, much slower than any of the other applications. This makes it very tedious to use.

  5. 12 minutes ago, Jowday said:

    AP has the worst demosaicing (at least the Windows version, on OS/X or iOS the Apple demosaicing is used), worst highlight and shadow recovery available in the commercial market etc. so even with this feature it cannot be considered suitable for serious raw processing. Even open source RAW converters like Rawtherapee and Darkroom are light years ahead using same demosaicing algorithm. And they are updated very often. New camera SENSORS are supported almost instantly.

    OK, I'm glad to be hearing this from another user, because I had been troubled by what I was seeing in the processed raw images but hadn't done a close comparison to the other apps yet. My experience is that the details look "smudgey" compared to what I see in Camera Raw or Raw Therapee. And the noise reduction is not attractive at all... makes the smudginess even worse, even at minimal settings. I'm running it on Windows.

  6. Here's another thing that's keeping me stuck using PS for the near future, as I haven't found a suitable replacement in another application...

    I require precise adjustments of curves for when I create calibrated contrast correction for alt process photo printing. I regularly print using gum pigment (aka, gum bichromate), kallitype, gumoil and cyanotype techniques. The overwhelming majority of my fine art prints are done this way. To get the best results, it is necessary create compensation curves to correct for the deficiencies of the print process. They are all different, and ideally one would create individual curves for each kind of paper used, as well as for the different processes. I feel confident saying this is the common practice amongst alt process photo printers these days, so I'm certainly not the only one who would benefit.

    A full description of the process I use can be found here: https://www.freestylephoto.biz/alternative-process/making-digital-negatives Please take special note of Figures H and I in the article because these illustrate exactly what I'm needing to do with curves.

    What I need is the ability to precisely input the required I/O numbers into the curves dialog. Not only do I not see any way to do this in AP's curves, I don't even see any sort of scale that would clue me in to where I am on the curve. I am able to read gray values the way I need with the eyedropper, but without being able accurately translate those numbers to a curve, I'm stuck with only half the tools I need to do this.

  7. 20 hours ago, ImageryByWarren said:

    AP cannot be considered suitable for serious raw processing until this feature is built in. Seems a very basic omission.

    Exactly. I was really hoping I wasn't the only one who considers this a basic function for raw processing. Without it, I can't consider AP for the serious photo work I do. The fact that it wasn't included from the very beginning makes me wonder who the intended user base is, because this is a big turn-off to professional photographers.

    In comparison, even freeware open-source applications like Raw Therapee have non-destructive raw processing. The non-destructive editing and ease of going back and tweaking is the main reason for using raw. 

  8. There needs to be a way to go back and forth between the Develop and Photo Personas non-destructively when working from Raw files. This has become the standard workflow for how I do it (and how I teach my students!) in PS: I open the raw file with CameraRAW and then choose to "Open as Smart Object" in PS after developing. This allows me to double click on the smart object layer and go back and tweak things in CameraRAW non-destructively. I had hoped it would work this way in Affinity, but it doesn't seem so. After Developing once and going into Photo persona, if I try to go back to Develop and tweak things, the previous settings are gone and it's like I'm starting over (without really starting over... more like re-applying some new setting on top of the old one).

    Also, would love if the Nik Collection plugins could run as Live Filters. Having to duplicate my image layer to get a pseudo-non-destructive edit is annoying because of how much larger it makes the file, and there's no way to go back and tweak a setting, just have to trash it and start over if I don't like how it turned out.

    Overall, I would like to see a push towards more non-destructive editing wherever possible.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.