Jump to content

derei

Members
  • Content count

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by derei

  1. you loose all data since the last autosave due to this issue!! Just got this nasty error when tried to save. Luckily I had a previous save and the file recovered automatically without too much work progress loss. I'd like to know the cause and what possible steps to take in order to prevent it in the future. Worth mentioning: I am using pCloud, which creates a virtual drive on the computer and I was saving there. Could this cause any issue (the sync process could take ownership of the file temporary or, to lock it in some way)? it is the first time when it happened, although i was saving the same for many times.
  2. One of the most successful 3D Mesh Modellers was SketchUp. The initial developers (@Last was their name) came with the most intuitive and simple way so far to work in the 3D space. Unfortunately, since Trimble acquired SketchUp, things started to go south and the company is more focused in money making at all costs (and by this I mean sucking the blood out of the people which have little choice but to stay with Sketchup for one reason or another) and did too little to improve the software and the experience. The new version (SketchUp 2019 just moved towards web-based and yearly subscription...and users aren't happy about it. On the other hand, there is another company which thought there would be a bit of a market to compete with SketchUp (Bricsys - https://www.bricsys.com/en-intl/), they are offering the free software Brics CAD Shape (https://www.bricsys.com/en-intl/shape/). The similarities with SketchUp are obvious, but the downside of this one is they won't allow expansion by using plugins. SketchUp's real power came from plugins developed by the community members. Maybe it wouldn't be such a bad idea for Affinity to consider an alternative for SketchUp, following the same principles: take what is good and make it better, but at a decent price. And focused on users, because users will reward you for that. Wishing you best!
  3. I have a Master Page with a text placeholder and I want to have a unique text on each page where that specific placeholder is. The issue is that the text is between two layers, so if I take the text out of the Master Page Group, (which has been created in page's layers when I applied the master page), the text won't be between those two layers anymore (it has to be between the layers, as the layers do some blending). So, I would like to be able to edit my text field on every page, but to not affect the Master Page. In Illustrator is possible to "release" a field so it can be edited independently from the Master Page. Any suggestions?
  4. done. I added your suggestion. thanks for pointing it out.
  5. Please read the first post in this topic and you will understand when it does it. And why... I experienced the joy of losing work 3 times before I decided to ask here about what's going on.
  6. I was referring specifically to the situation when Affinity can't save (due to remote disk communication issue) and it closes the document on purpose (that's not a crash, is a deliberate command). So, before closing the document, Affinity could simply make a recovery file with everything that hasn't been saved yet and then close. I really can't see what is the issue here. But instead, as it is now, AF Photo will forcibly close the document and any unsaved edits are gone... sad, very sad.
  7. I didn't get any notification for update and when trying to download it, the file received is still 206. Could you please provide a download link? Thank you. @fde101 nvm, I found a link on the forum. Thanks for letting me know about the new version!
  8. Great feature! Maybe there should be another flag added to this function: when an error happens and Affinity can't perform a normal save... I understand that in the event of a crash, it can't operate because.. it crashed, but when the software is operating normally, I don't understand why it doesn't perform a quick recovery save before shutting down.
  9. @fde101 Right-Clicking on that group of layers, on my "normal" page, shows the following menu (see attached): AF Publisher Version: 1.7.0.206 if yours looks different, kindly please share a screenshot.
  10. @dutchshader did you manage to find it? If so, do you mind attaching a screenshot? I can't seem to find those options. Thanks.
  11. guess you're right... plus this guys have all our bank account details too... Don't you suddenly start feeling oppressed? :))
  12. I noticed the objects in Publisher are all surrounded with a purple outline, including text. For text this is really annoying as I can't clearly see the fill color and asses that against the document (visual contrast, aesthetics, etc). Is it any way to disable the purple outline? The outline is not some effect applied to the text, it comes from the way Affinity is displaying the elements. I also have an image imported in Publisher which has the same purple outline. - see attached
  13. I understand that, but what puzzles me is that I was able to work just fine all along and edit my work, until I decided to save... when it closed. And it didn't happen once, it was repetitive, at least 3 times it happened until I decided to write on this forum. So, if Affinity needs continuous access, why it was no warning and I was allowed to do my work all along? And why it only happened when I tried to save? Also, on opening, there was a recovery dialog which helped me recover a part of my edits, but not all of them (which is weird also, why AF Photo won't save a temp recovery data when such situation happens). From all talks on this subject, I still see no reason for the following: Why Affinity does not give any option for the user to take action, but instead just informs the user about the unavoidable and then closes (don't you find that rude?) Why Affinity has to close the document and there is no better solution, like automatic check of connection, and/or even allowing the user to manually re-select the path to file? Why Affinity doesn't save the changes until the last one locally (in a temp file), so they can be recovered next time when the file is being open? For me, it all looks like Affinity didn't manage this aspect very well and it would be in their best interest to show their presence here, to let us know they are hearing us and they will take proper action in order to improve user experience on this matter (and not only on this one).
  14. Surprisingly, it seems is not. My issue while saving on my pCloud virtual drive confirmed it: whilst Affinity Photo was NOT able to save, I had no problem opening the drive and interacting with the files there. So, the storage was available, but for some reason Affinity could not access it. What I can assume are 2 things: 1. pCloud is "locking" the file while sending it to the cloud server, so Affinity "thought" it cannot be overwritten/saved. 2. there was a short intrerruption at some point and Affinity did not check again @R C-R I understand your point with cached copies, indeed, too many variables and too many complications in too many scenarios. Most probably this wouldn't be the desired solution. Perhaps then making sure the connection is re-checked, or allowing the user to select the path to the file (in case Affinity can't automatically find it for some reason), and also if possible to save the modifications so they can be recovered.
  15. Guys, this debate became way too generic. There are two types of interruptions: short (milliseconds - seconds) and long (minutes or even permanent). Two different approaches for two different situations: if interruption is short, that means is most probably "sleeping" and it needed a wake-up signal, or it was a short network drop, or something else. But this also means is back in no time. So, after the first failed attempt, the software should warn the user, WITHOUT CLOSING THE DOCUMENT and the user can check the connection of the drive (in explorer, for example) and then try again to save. if interruption is long or permanent (someone simply unplugged the drive, or internet is down), there isn't much to do. Obviously the document has to be closed, but maybe a better recovery system could be implemented so all tools and operations can be recovered since the last successful save on the disk. Now, as long as there isn't any "observer" or "listener" to check connection continuously, I see no reason why there would be any negative impact in performance. Just don't close the document until the user performs another attempt to save. Keep everything on stand-by and there is a very big chance that the connection will be re-established with the help of the user. I really don't see where is the issue here, conceptually speaking. Also, having a cached copy locally would be a safety measure, a redundancy point. Yes, more space occupied on the local disk... and I see no problem with that. The storage media is meant to be used. I'd welcome a setting in Affinity to allow me to decide on which drive to create a "cached copy" of the current documents. I'd be happy to reserve ~10GB or so for that, when Affinity software is open, just to make sure my files are safe. Of course, there are issues here: what if you have Photo, Designer and Publisher open at the same time? Well, whoever wants to do graphics they usually invest in a decent machine with decent storage... there has to be a compromise anywhere.
  16. I had no idea the issue dates for so long... and it is unfortunate that Affinity didn't get any improvement in this aspect yet... Recently it happened to me too, that I lost part of my work because of AF Photo handled the situation. I expect much more from such a great software! my post where I describe the issue:
  17. From what I see here, people are debating a lot in terms of fixing... opinions are strong on both sides. It looks very much like Brexit ... to make a reference to your signature :))))) ... so, we'll wait and see. In the meantime, I'll hire an Egyptian Scribe to sync my files every time.
  18. Or is like... windows popping-up the UAC warning... bit annoying at times, but extremely useful! I agree with this: if there isn't any elegant solution to FIX it (fix = make it work as it should), then a warning with the possibility of disabling (don't show it anymore) would be the common sense thing. Why? Because many (most) users would expect the software to work with a networked drive, not knowing there might be stops in communication and that might lead to their work being lost. So, a warning would... warn.
  19. Although this topic seems old, maybe someone would be interested to replicate my method (i'm using it for creating shadows): ☐ Image_to_blur ⬕ Live Filter - Gaussian Blur (HIGH value) ⬛ Live Filter - Gaussian Blur (LOW value) Apply a gradient masking on the topmost live filter, to reveal the second blur filter applied. obs: * it doesn't matter which filter is on top, as long as you apply the gradient on the topmost one and the direction of the gradient reveals the blur transition in the desired direction * the Blur Live Filters have to be applied as children to the layer to blur, so they will only affect that one. Attached an example of this procedure, along with the complementary layers to cast a shadow. * for gradient blur, only the info in red boxes is relevant. The gray info is only important for shadow casting.
  20. I noticed the "jaggy effect" on other types of selections, for the same reason of "selection lock on pixels" and it often requires editing of the mask, to remove this irregularity. Smoothing the selection still keeps a very "wavy" line, unless considerable smoothing is being applied, but then the selection gets affected everywhere. So, this should be improved in a future release. Thanks for making AF better!
  21. will keep an eye on it and I will report back when I will have more data. Thank you for your effort to help.
  22. Windows 7 Pro x64 AF Photo version: 1.6.5.132 When I tried to use the Healing Brush on an image that had Perspective Live Filter applied on it, did nothing. Once I disabled the filter, I could retouch the image using the Healing Brush. After editing I re-enabled the Perspective Filter Layer. If this is a desired behavior, then it should pop a warning when user tries to use an incompatible tool, or if it is a bug, I can only hope my post will be helpful enough so the issue can be fixed. I was working on the same document as in this post:
  23. Obviously I will do the same in the future. Unfortunately I had a bit of hard time until I understood what is happening. There was no warning/notification, so I discovered it by trial.
  24. Windows 7 Pro x64 AF Photo version: 1.6.5.132 I noticed today that the Inpainting Brush was not "drawing" where the circle is, but rather with an offset to the right. The offset seems to be in absolute value, not in percent of its diameter, so if the brush is small, it will draw completely out of the brush circle. As an observation, yesterday I was working on the same document, but I don't remember having any issues, except today. I could provide the document by email, if required. As screenshot didn't capture the cursor, I had to take photos of the screen. Apologies for the quality. EDIT: After closing the document and opening it again, the Inpainting Brush worked fine. This makes the issue even more worrying, as it doesn't have consistency, so it might be hard to reproduce.
  25. As stated on this post: It seems that when a Perspective Live Filter is applied to an image, the effect of a brush is being applied with an offset dependent on the Perspective Filter. So, the effect and the cursor circle will not be on the same spot. This issue should be addressed as it's more of a bug than a "by design" feature. Whilst I understand the effect is also being offset, the cursor circle should mark the are where the effect is being applied, because that's the whole point of the circle cursor: to mark the affected area.
×