Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

John-B

Members
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John-B

  1. On 6/6/2022 at 5:34 AM, NathanC said:

    Hi @John-B,

    I've not been able to replicate this using separated mode after Pressing 'Dont Save' as the Window which contained my file is completely closed and i'm left with the toolbars and panels only, what version of MacOS are you running? Is Photo on v1.10.5?

    That is what happens for me as well. If you click Don't Save, the window goes away. It only remains if you click Save (I incorrectly said click OK in my OP, meaning the default).

    Steps to reproduce:

    • Open a document.
    • Edit the document, but don't Save.
    • Close the doc.
    • In the save reminder dialog, click Save.

    The empty window remains every time for me.

    Affinity Photo 1.10.5, Mac OS 12.4 (Apple Silicon).

  2. Whenever I close a document window without saving, and I then click OK in the dialog that asks me if I want to save the document, the document goes away, but the empty window is still there. I then have to close the empty window. This happens 100% of the time when the save reminder dialog pops up. If I close a window that doesn't need to be saved, the window closes normally. I'm using the mode with separate windows, I don't remember what that's called.

  3. 22 minutes ago, Old Bruce said:

    Happens here with OS 12.6.5

    I find if I choose the originating window and move its location a bit (or a lot) then the other(s) will become solid again. This is one of the reasons I so very rarely use Separated Mode.

    I ONLY use separated mode, so it would be nice if this were fixed. On the bright side, I never intentionally drag one window into another, so it doesn't happen very often.

  4. 6 minutes ago, Callum said:

    Hi John-b,

    Does the shortcut for showing your desktop CMD + F3 cause the ghost windows to disappear?

    Thanks
    C

    The ghost windows disappear with everything else, but they come right back. The only thing that SOMETIMES makes the windows go away is clicking in another AP document window. A few minutes ago, that fixed it, but I tried just now, and no amount of clicking anywhere will make the ghosts go away. Actually, I just went back to AP and clicked through each of the open windows several times, and the ghosts did go away. I just have to be persistent.

  5. Whenever I have two documents sharing the same window in tabs (which I only ever do accidentally), when I drag one out, it leaves behind ghost windows. These transparent windows are on top of everything else. Eventually, they go away, but I usually have to restart AP since it can take a while. This happened on my old machine, a late-2015 iMac, 10.14, and it happens on my new machine, a Mac Studio 12.3.1, Photo 1.10.5.

    1226415854_GhostWindows.thumb.jpg.c3ba2409cf3ce02b0a339a155c70d662.jpg

  6. 23 hours ago, Lagarto said:

    The best interchange of compositional information seems to happen when opening a Xara exported PSD file in Photoshop:

    Looks like Xara is an subscription-based online graphics app. Are you suggesting using Xara as a go between? That is, subscribing to another app to translate Affinity Photo files?  A $12.95 per month subscription doesn't seem like a great solution. Or are you suggesting using Xara instead of AP? That's not an option for me, as I don't use subscription-based apps.

    As far as I'm concerned, formatting is not as important as edibility. Even if all formatting is lost, it would at least save the time of re-entering all the text, which is time consuming and error prone.

  7. On 1/12/2021 at 11:30 AM, Alfred said:

    Unfortunately not. The Affinity apps can optionally import PSD text as editable text, but there is currently no such option when exporting to PSD format.

    That makes it a bit challenging to exchange files with PS users. Seems like if editable text can be imported, there'd be no reason it could not be exported. Maybe it's a copyright issue, PS's file format is proprietary?

  8. This discussion has taken a pointless turn. What difference does it make how AP represents and arranges image data? I create and edit files in AP format, but save them out in TIFF, PNG, or JPG formats. It doesn't matter to me HOW AP saves the data internally, it's the data that AP saves that's important. Even more important for this discussion, a portion of those data have been made non-editable for some unknown and apparently arbitrary reason.

  9. On 6/1/2020 at 7:26 PM, sfriedberg said:

    Long before Photoshop became the 800lb gorilla in the market place, there were image editors that could manipulate arbitrary numbers of independent channels, and there was extensive use of the alpha channel for blending, transparency and overlays.  "Channel ops" was a thing before PS made it popular.

    Affinity Photo HAS all the necessary functionality already, they just disable it for the alpha channel. You can currently select and edit (using all the existing editing tools) any channel EXCEPT the alpha channel. So it's not a matter of adding new functionality, which I could understand not being a high priority. Unless it really is some intellectual property issue, it would appear they are intentionally crippling their software. I'd like to hear an official response as to why they don't do something that's about as simple as changing the value of a Boolean variable. 

  10. On 5/11/2020 at 6:28 AM, Chris B said:

    I would definitely recommend working in non-Separated mode until we get the beta. As I said this is fixed in Publisher but we're waiting on Photo and Designer to catch up.

    I really am not sure why your app isn't remembering the recent documents. Where do you normally save work to? 

     

    Non-separated mode is very inconvenient for me, since I normally have many docs open at the same time. I turn off full-screen mode in any app that has it and lets me turn it off. Though now that I can only have a single doc open while editing text, I guess it doesn't make as much of a difference.

    The Open Recent menu started working again, not sure when as I've stopped checking it. FWIW, I save files to my Home folder.

  11. On 5/7/2020 at 4:20 AM, Chris B said:

    If you leave Separated Mode, the app will likely return to the default layout and you'd have to make any panel positioning changes again.

    This should be fixed in the beta when we get it.

    This should be controlled by your Mac System Preferences - General > Recent items.

    Recent Items is set to 20 in my SysPrefs, and other programs remember docs.  As I said, since the recent update, AP's Open Recent always has just one menu item pop up: Clear Menu. It used to remember, now it appears to have suffered some memory loss.

    BTW, I'm having even more problems with text. Yesterday I was not able to edit text AT ALL with any other window open. Every time I tried to change the font size, or style, or anything, it would jump to another open window. I was never able to succeed in setting a single-character to bold or change its size. I eventually gave up and copied the text from another document (before I realized it would work if I closed all other windows).

  12. 2 hours ago, Chris B said:

    Window > Separated Mode. 

    It essentially makes every look separated and to appear floating, as opposed to everything being grouped/stuck together. 

    Yes, something I set up the first time I opened AP and never thought about since. The "everything in one window that takes over the entire screen" scheme is not well-suited to my workflow, working with multiple documents and having quick access to Finder windows in the background. If I turn off separated mode, would I have to reopen and reposition all my palettes after I turn it back on?

    To summarize, so far I've found:

    • Frame Text tool - editing and everything else slows, apparently only when another document, or other documents, are open

    • Artistic Text tool does not allow entering more than 1 character

    • Color Picker palette sometimes, but not always, is dismissed after entering a single value

    • File -> Open Recent does not remember recently-opened documents

  13. I'll try to take a look at this later today. What is "separated mode"? Is that a Prefs setting?

    I just tried closing all open windows and restarting AP, and the text tool seems to be working with just one, new, empty window. Previously, it didn't seem to matter what else was open.  I was going to try opening some of the other docs I'd had open, to see if one of them might be the problem, but the Open Recent menu doesn't seem to be working any more (something I noticed recently as well), it's always empty now.

    I found one of the docs I'd had open when I was experiencing the problems, opened it, and slow text editing is back. With this other doc open, text editing slows to a crawl in a new, empty doc. Close that other doc, and editing text in the new doc goes back to normal speed.

  14. 6 hours ago, Chris B said:

    Hey John-B,

    I am not experiencing this. I've asked a few colleagues to see if anyone else has reported it to see if there's a known casuse.

    Could you go to Preferences > Performance and screenshot the dialog so I can see what settings you're using?

    Also, is it the Artistic Text Tool or the Frame Text Tool—or both?

    Have you done a check in FontBook to see if any bad fonts are installed?

    Attached is the screen capture of my preferences, all defaults I believe, not changed since updating AP.

    It's the Frame Text tool that I normally use that I'm seeing problems with. I just tried the Artistic Text tool, and it doesn't seem to work at all. As soon as I type the first character, it suddenly brings another open AP window to the front. Just tried it a few times with the same result.

    I'm not sure how to find bad fonts in Font Book, but I haven't installed any new fonts recently, and this problems started after the AP update.

    I've seen other odd behavior too, not sure if it's related. The color picker popup now dismisses itself after I enter a single number (RGB, HSL). Tabbing or clicking a different field causes the dialog to go away. If I want to set an RGB value, I have to open the color picker three times now.

     

    AP Screen.png

  15. Ever since the most recent update, 1.8.3, text editing has become so slow as to be almost unusable for me. It doesn't matter the document, or how many documents are open. There's a pause after every character I type, and if I type several characters quickly, the beach ball spins for several seconds (20-30) while it catches up. It's not just editing text, but anything involving the text, such as the font size popup menu that takes several seconds just to appear, and several more seconds to disappear after a size is selected. Same for setting text color, everything related to text is SLOW. I've run into a few other annoying problems since the update, but this is by far the worst. I'm using MacOS 10.14.6.

  16. I guess I touched a nerve with this post.

    I recently discovered another problem associated with the way alpha channels are handled. If you let AF create the alpha (e.g., drawing a circle on an otherwise empty canvas with a transparent background), the empty space remains empty in AF, but not necessarily when you save as TIFF and open in another app. I noticed this when I was making light-colored buttons with rounded edges. When I placed the light-colored buttons on a light-colored background the buttons had a black border. They were not antialiasing correctly with their background, and I've not been able to eliminate that dark edge completely. In Photoshop this was never an issue because I always made the edges of the button graphic match the background the buttons would be on, so they always had nice-looking edges and blended seamlessly. 

  17. On 9/27/2019 at 8:46 AM, Patrick Connor said:

    Agreed, but that has not been our target market so far, sorry. Better tools to edit the alpha channel directly will be needed before Affinity Photo would be more suitable for the parts of the games industry that reply on TGA-alpha for texture storage.

    It's not just textures. Transparent textures are expensive in 3D games, and I use them very sparingly. For me, it's creating the 2D interface where control of the alpha channel is most important, something I do all the time, where it's not just making cutouts. For example, a button with an alpha drop shadow can be created in AP, as I eventually learned,  it's just a different workflow. The same is true for other alpha effects I used to do in PS. I've been able to get AP to do what I've needed to do with the alpha channel, it's just not always as direct or obvious as doing it in PS.

    However, regardless of AP's target audience, there doesn't appear to be any reason NOT to make the alpha channel accessible. All they have to do is make the little icon that indicates that a layer is editable work for the alpha channel (currently it's a button that does nothing). The editing tools are already there, they're just blocked from working in the alpha channel. It seems like they're going out of their way to treat the alpha channel as a special, non-editable layer.

  18. On 4/22/2019 at 5:43 AM, R C-R said:

    If by arbitrary position you mean a straight line at any arbitrary angle (not just those aligned to the horizontal or vertical axis), then no that is not possible, not even with Illustrator's Align to Pixel Grid options.

    What kind of selection do you mean? Vector objects are not defined by how many whole or partial pixels they fill; instead they are defined by the geometry of a path, which could consist of any number of straight and/or curved segments. So for example, an elliptical or circular vector object has no straight line segments at all; a rounded rectangle could have any combination of straight & curved segments depending on the geometry of its corners; & a vector path can have a stroke that is not a constant width anywhere over its entire length.

    Vector objects can also be rotated to any arbitrary angle & their fills & strokes can have continuously variable color and/or transparent gradients. They can be masked or clipped by other vector objects, each defined by the geometry of its path, & whatever colors & transparencies it may have.

    Because they are not defined by how many pixels they fully or partially fill, you can't really select just some of their pixels or just some of the  color, transparency, stroke or fill properties of those pixels like you can with pixel-based rasterized objects.

    BTW, much the same thing applies to text objects because their properties are also not defined strictly by how many pixels they fill.

    By arbitrary position, I mean any location within the document, NOT any rotation. I'm talking about horizontal and vertical lines. 

    By selection, I mean a selection made with a marquee tool in a pixel layer. (There is more than one way to draw a line.) In the attached image, I made a selection with the Column Marquee Tool, and filled it with white on a black background (left line). Then I made another column selection, filled it, then dragged it a few pixels to the right (other line). You can see in the screen capture that the second line is still selected, but it's gotten wider and darker, the filled area now extends past the "selected" pixels.

    So it looks like it's not possible to be precise with either vector or pixel objects. I understand why this is the case with vector objects, but a pixel is a pixel. A selected area of pixels should NOT change its appearance or size as it's dragged around the document.

    Line Sample.jpg

  19. On 3/30/2019 at 12:07 PM, Mithferion said:

    It depends of the position of the line.

    So it's not possible to draw a precise, single-pixel line in an arbitrary position? What about filling a one-pixel wide selection? Why does that also depend on position? Shouldn't a filled selection include all the pixels within the selection, and none outside, with the same color/transparency? It looks like it's doing antialiasing whether I want it to or not.  Is it not possible to do precision, pixel-perfect drawing?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.